Support Forum

[victor]

Hello,

I have been thinking (tremble maxim ;) ) about a possible attribute to the messages. This is a maybe useful improvent, well it would be a useful improvement but I dont know If it would be a rarely used improvement.

The idea is that could be interesting to define a message that can't modify the task handler.

For example: We'd like have a message that everyone could send to the actual handler but that this message wouldn't allow to change the handler.

- Programmer A is developing a fix.
- Programmer B send a note in this task telling to A: 'I solved another very similar bug the last week and I could help you and solve it more quickly. Give the task If you want I solve it.'
- Programmer A then reassing the task to B or send another not saying 'no thanks' o simply ignore it.

[admin]

Hello,

I have been thinking (tremble maxim ) about a possible attribute to the messages. This is a maybe useful improvent, well it would be a useful improvement but I dont know If it would be a rarely used improvement.

The idea is that could be interesting to define a message that can't modify the task handler.

For example: We'd like have a message that everyone could send to the actual handler but that this message wouldn't allow to change the handler.

- Programmer A is developing a fix.
- Programmer B send a note in this task telling to A: 'I solved another very similar bug the last week and I could help you and solve it more quickly. Give the task If you want I solve it.'
- Programmer A then reassing the task to B or send another not saying 'no thanks' o simply ignore it.

Yes, this feature is similar to the feature that we have been discussed several months ago and I remember that you need more fine grained handler processing But for 3.0 we schedule security improvements only

[victor]

Yes, this feature is similar to the feature that we have been discussed several months ago and I remember that you need more fine grained handler processing :-) But for 3.0 we schedule security improvements only :-(

Eps... When you are telling about security improvements are you including the multi-role feature?

And what about the others improvements suggested?

Thanks

[admin]

Yes, this feature is similar to the feature that we have been discussed several months ago and I remember that you need more fine grained handler processing But for 3.0 we schedule security improvements only

Eps... When you are telling about security improvements are you including the multi-role feature?

And what about the others improvements suggested?

Thanks

Yes.

Other improvements:
1) More roles (for user and sub-users, for example)
2) Field-level security
3) Role hierarchy (if user has task_modify role, he task_view automatically)
4) Multiple roles per project (not sure).
5) Secured API/SOAP