Support Forum

[victor]

Hello (again),

Trying to use a deep search filter with two sorting criterias I found that the second sort criterion is not respected.

If I define a filter:
- Deep search
- Handler ascending level 1
And a) or b)
a) Task Id ascending level 2
b) Submiter ascending level 2

Result:
- Sorted fine respect the sort criterion level 1.
- Sorted wrong respect the sort criterion level 2:
- For tasks without handler the sort criterion level 2 is applied right.
- For task with handler the tree traverse disturb the sort criterion level 2 and the result is unsorted or partially sorted.

Thanks,

[admin]

Hello (again),

Trying to use a deep search filter with two sorting criterias I found that the second sort criterion is not respected.

If I define a filter:
- Deep search
- Handler ascending level 1
And a) or b)
a) Task Id ascending level 2
b) Submiter ascending level 2

Result:
- Sorted fine respect the sort criterion level 1.
- Sorted wrong respect the sort criterion level 2:
- For tasks without handler the sort criterion level 2 is applied right.
- For task with handler the tree traverse disturb the sort criterion level 2 and the result is unsorted or partially sorted.

Thanks,

This bug should be fixed, please try
http://www.trackstudio.com/tse-28/trackstudio.jar

[victor]

This bug should be fixed, please try
http://www.trackstudio.com/tse-28/trackstudio.jar

Ok, I test it and run fine... But, I have a doubt with the jar inside the last release 2.8.1 and the jar in this topic. I found that the 2.8.1 release advice is more new that your message about this bug fix. What jar I have to use? I suspect that the bug fix is only in this jar and not in the jar inside 2.8.1 release.

Thanks

[admin]

This bug should be fixed, please try
http://www.trackstudio.com/tse-28/trackstudio.jar

Ok, I test it and run fine... But, I have a doubt with the jar inside the last release 2.8.1 and the jar in this topic. I found that the 2.8.1 release advice is more new that your message about this bug fix. What jar I have to use? I suspect that the bug fix is only in this jar and not in the jar inside 2.8.1 release.

Thanks

Its very strange, please use jar from this message.