Andy wrote:Can I setup the default handler for new tasks and bugs to be the submitter?
Andy wrote:Perhaps, but it's quite cumbersome because you cannot set the handler when creating a task -- you have to add a message. This seems to be an unnecessary restriction.
admin wrote:Andy wrote:Perhaps, but it's quite cumbersome because you cannot set the handler when creating a task -- you have to add a message. This seems to be an unnecessary restriction.
OK, agree. Possible, we'll implement it in the next version
admin wrote:admin wrote:Andy wrote:Perhaps, but it's quite cumbersome because you cannot set the handler when creating a task -- you have to add a message. This seems to be an unnecessary restriction.
OK, agree. Possible, we'll implement it in the next version
Done, enjoy :-)
victor wrote:admin wrote:admin wrote:Andy wrote:Perhaps, but it's quite cumbersome because you cannot set the handler when creating a task -- you have to add a message. This seems to be an unnecessary restriction.
OK, agree. Possible, we'll implement it in the next version
Done, enjoy
done? what do you mean? have you done this improvement?
(expectant silence)
admin wrote:And some restriction - now you can't change task category after you click the "add" button. We found that this cause many cumbersome (logical) problems. Suppose, you can create "bug", and can't create "task" (defined by settings in Edit Category). Both use "Default" workflow.
Early you can create "bug", and change category to "task", because you can create/modify "bug" and task has the same workflow as bug.
Another sample - developer can process "bug" in some state, but can't process "task" in the same state. After somebody change category from "bug" to "task" - we got bug that handler can't process.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest